trust, confidence, and cooperative development

a great read–looking at the fundamental loss of trust in society. The article points out both the steps that have led to the lack of trust–both economic and social–as well as historical and recent theory that might explain some of the behavior.  The author points to how this decline of trust has led to the increase of inequality–and the social attitudinal mindset that has a systemic hard-to-reverse momentum.

In considering how this might actually be also affecting our efforts at economic development, it seems to resonate quite well.  Cities internally with more trust (institutions that are working), confidence, and leadership ‘seem’ to be doing better than those that have lack of leadership, broken and non trustworthy institutions, and no confidence (signs) that things will change.  And, in order to build trust between cities–that now compete for scarce resources–we need to engage in collective dependency and a conversation about how systems we rely on work across our boundaries, and not just within.

The system of incentives described in the article comes to bear very directly in the practice of city/state/federal Economic Development policy.  It’s become such a necessary element in conversations about growth and expansion, but these opportunities seem to be thrown at a very  specific subset of actors (the most visible, desirable, and the ones that seek it out), a corporate 1%, and those investments/resources not more equitably distributed to those that could be better supported for growth locally.   Do incentives really generate growth in the economy or do they just provide an ‘icing on the cake’ to help catalyze (or rationalize) a decision….?

I don’t actually agree with the final conclusion, as I think that regulations create too many hurdles and keep the majority of people from engaging in systems (and letting their voices be heard). Regulations are not in and of themselves ‘the bad guy’ but they are often written by those that do not fundamentally understand how complex industries work–an exclusive group of self interested parties.  Transparency and more models that encourage institutional dependencies, and cooperative learning are necessary, and people need to build trust through iterative and dynamic cooperative projects.  People doing things together, learning things, and creating real things,  build the collective neural pathways necessary for society.

connected cities –thoughts by Elinor Ostrom

I’m not sure why this passed me by, but in doing thesis research, I came across the work of Elinor Ostrom who is primarily known for her work in economic governance and in effect network-related institutional architecture, for which she won a Nobel prize.

“Worldwide, we are seeing a heterogeneous collection of cities interacting in a way that could have far-reaching influence on how Earth’s entire life-support system evolves. These cities are learning from one another, building on good ideas and jettisoning poorer ones…. In the coming decades, we may see a global system of interconnected sustainable cities emerging. If successful, everyone will want to join the club.”

Read more at http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/green-from-the-grassroots#owXzUH45QKxvTUDI.99

yea!

thesis interrupted–novice researcher thinks that all scholarly theories apply to her topic

IMAG1109It’s true that the last time i did a research paper was before the dawn of the internet.  Therefore, the early work to look thru relevant research on my thesis topic has been both exciting and really very overwhelming. Having such information at my fingertips has been like standing on the beach in a tsunami, hoping that i’ll keep my head above water.  I have managed to find a topic that seems to pull in every theory ever invented…or is that just a sign that I don’t know how to narrow my focus? Network Theory, Judo Strategy, New Economic Geography, Innovation Cluster Theory, etc…it all seems so appropriate as  a reference, and the documentation is endless! There are many smart thinking documents out there, how in the world can my simple passions/thoughts be meaningful in a world full of giant thoughts?

Aside from the pure indulgence that this research period affords me, i’m also completely enthralled and annoyed by all of the methods of workflow management out there.  It’s hard enough for me to coordinate address book/contact lists between devices and social media platforms, let alone put all of my work in ‘one place’!   So far i’ve been utilizing Evernote as a great single multi-device platform to keep track of my brilliant ideas–from day long research spa days (delightfully uninterrupted snow days….) to classroom distractions and to middle of the night inspirations.  However, I still fall back on translating ideas into post-it notes, post it notes organized and back into a word document, and a very messy ‘ongoing’ bibliography.  Mostly because i’m too concerned about the time it will take to learn a new program that will ‘cite’ for me.

Luckily, this thesis is for a management school–so the scholarship scan can be broad, but I only have 2 months to go and much to put on paper!  Instead of searching all strands of research, I will set myself a deadline, and move to what I’m really trying to do….Additionally, i will work to streamline my writing through blogging, and hoping that the bibliography and footnotes at the end will not be too painful.  Finally, as i toggle between thinking that my ideas are useful to the world and that i’m stating the obvious, Iwill blog most of the sections on this blog, and I welcome your comments!